The Dispossessed

an ambiguous Utopia

The story takes place on the fictional planet Urras and its moon Anarres (since Anarres is massive enough to hold an atmosphere, this is often described as a double planet system). In order to forestall an anarcho-syndical workers' rebellion, the major Urrasti states gave the revolutionaries the right to live on Anarres, along with a guarantee of non-interference, approximately two hundred years before the events of The Dispossessed.[2] Before this, Anarres had had no permanent settlements apart from some mining.

The protagonist Shevek is a physicist attempting to develop …

400 pages

English language

Published Dec. 1, 1994 by Eos.

Show more

View on OpenLibrary

Reviews

This novel is not about a utopia

At first I thought this novel was going to have a setting of utopia versus dystopia. However, the book goes much deeper than that. There isn't actually any kind of utopia presented really, because the book critically engages with the "utopian" anarchist society and interestingly highlights possible conflicts and issues within such a society as well. Philosophical themes are also explored in dialogue between characters, discussing moral dilemmas and societal issues, arguably making the dialogue the best part of the book with the world building being a close second.

Throughout the whole book you can also see conflict of opposing concepts, such as capitalism and socialism, rich and poor, past and present, individuality and society, hierarchy and anarchy, and the possessed and the dispossessed. Even the protagonists scientific theories attempt to unite two opposing concepts of time.

Altogether, an incredible book I cannot recommend enough, and unexpectedly funny at times too!

Enjoyable and thought provoking

I'm have only read this once before and remember thinking it was heavy which - while not putting me off re-reading - meant it never floated to prominence on my to-read list. This time I found it, not "lighter" per se, but something, certainly. Overall, it meant that I really enjoyed it in ways I wasn't expecting.

Structurally, I liked the interweaving twin timelines (in a book about the physics of simultaneity and the past, present and future being present together was a nice touch). And this theme was interesting to see having just read The River Has Roots and its riddles relying on the acceptance of a past, present and future.

But so much to think on freedom.